|
|
||||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Home > About Us> Approach > Case Study: Online Content |
|
Case Study: Online Content for Low-Income and Other Underserved AmericansMissionWhile the Internet transforms the nature of opportunity in the workplace, schools, and society, millions of low-income and other underserved families and young people are not able to benefit from the digital revolution because they lack adequate access to computers and the Internet and/or to the content and skills to use them effectively.The goal of the program is to make sure that digital opportunities extend to all young people and their communities, particularly those who are low income and underserved. BackgroundFrom 1996 until 2000, The Children’s Partnership had been working to help accelerate the diffusion of technology into low-income neighborhoods, through a 4-year, $6 million project called Computers in Our Future, funded by The California Wellness Foundation. The goal was to work at a very local level to help close the Digital Divide between those that have access to computers and those who do not. The project was designed to provide computers, the Internet, and quality instruction, and to help communities define how best to deploy them for the health and benefit of their residents. More than 25,000 young people participated over 4 years.Problem to SolveThe Computers in our Future project included 11 community technology centers located in neighborhoods throughoutProposed SolutionSince we discovered this “content gap,” our first step was to undertake the research to understand the extent of this gap and describe what content was needed.The Children’s Partnership invested nine months of research including focus groups with low-income Internet users across the country, interviews with community technology leaders, an independent analysis of more than 1,000 Web sites, and a review of relevant research and literature. The research was released in Online Content for Low-income and Underserved Americans, The Digital Divide’s New Frontier, in March of 2000. It is a Strategic Audit, an analytic tool developed by The Children’s Partnership to survey and analyze a broad field undergoing significant changes. The Audit is designed to look at emerging issues in order to understand the nature of the problem and to identify recommendations for action that can enable policy-makers, community practitioners, and private-sector developers to become part of the solution. Findings included: At least 50 million Americans--roughly 20%--face one or more content-related barriers that stand between them and the benefits offered by the Internet. Barriers include:
After the release of this report (with coverage in The New York Times, USA Today, and many other print, online, and radio publications), The Children’s Partnership followed-up with:
In addition, we conducted a broad outreach program online, in print, in the media, and through speaking engagements. Core questionsIs this issue a critical one?Advocacy to ensure that the digital economy and society includes low-income, disabled, and other underserved communities is crucial since there is a persistent gap between those who have access to the technology and skills to use it and those who do not. Timing is especially important as the Internet and related technologies increasingly become the standard way of doing business and accessing opportunities for learning, jobs, health information, etc. The Children’s Partnership’s research and subsequent activities helped define what was needed and then spurred many groups to focus on needed content which addresses the “content barriers” listed above. For example, One Economy, a nonprofit organization focused on bringing high-speed Internet into low-income housing, has developed The Beehive, using, in part, The Children’s Partnership's research as a guide for content development. Could our change model deliver a direct and
tangible service to significant numbers of families and young
people? Contentbank and our continuing research on content evaluation and creation has directly helped others develop content for underserved communities. One example is First Find, a Web
site developed by a group of libraries in Could our change model be taken to scale? Is our model sustainable? Is this change model a new contribution? Will this model help develop new, influential
constituencies that could help serve the long-term goal of access to
technology for all children (and possibly beyond)? Does this change model help build public will? |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||